Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl) said:
Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 16:50 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a):
Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl) said:
Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 11:46 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): [..]
I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the logic behind this?
(I'm just after short review of m17n) IMO it will be better ask why m17n was included to distribution packages list.
Dependency of scim-m17n, replacement for scim-tables.
Replacement ? I don't see Obsoletes rules beetween scim-m17n and scim-tables and/or why scim-tables is still around ?
Sorry, replacement for some set of languages that scim-tables supported; I don't recall which ones.
Bill