On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:
First of all, that would be two bug reports per year, as we have a 6 month development cycle. But it also will not be that useful, as we already have three things that have to be done by every maintainer once or twice a year, so they can be easily used to track, whether or not a maintainer is still around at all: FAS password, Koji certificate Bugzilla password. Then if you intend to catch unused packages, this will also fail unless you also plan to implement some captcha for this for every package, because there will be a script that a maintainer can run to close all bugs for all of his packages at once, even for the packages he does not maintain properly. So you will still only track down, whether or not a packager is still around and not whether he cares about a certain package.
Yes, I believe the expression you're looking for is:
"Perfect is the enemy of the good"
What is being suggested is not perfect. It is, however, good.
-sv