On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path
> policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still
> allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable.
That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the
critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc.
but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day.
Right, the critical path package list does contain the GNOME stack, cups-libs,