On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, James Hubbardjameshubbard@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jeff Spaletajspaleta@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, James Hubbardjameshubbard@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to berate people into using x86_64 as I've seen in this and other threads has gotten annoying.
Berate? I'm not trying to berate anyone. What I am trying to do is get a handle on how to potentially mitigate as much as possible avoidable impact associated with an architecture policy change if and when it happens. If running 32bit Fedora on 64bit hardware is widespread, any substantial change in policy with regard to 32bit maybe more disruptive than we originally realize. Hmm, I wonder does smolt give any relevant info as to my question. Can smolt tell give me an indication of the percentage of 64bit capable systems which are running 32bit Fedora? Hmm.
Sorry, I'm not saying you specifically. There have a been a far number of messages in which tone has seemed to be that you have to use x86_64 if you have hardware.
My apologies.
s/have to/should/
Unless you have a specific reason not do so.