Richard Shaw wrote:
Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now been bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL.
Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply a static library, at least in EPEL...
I can't speak for EPEL, but in Fedora I'd rather you just bump the soname and rebuild the applications using the library when it is needed.
Kevin Kofler