On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:59 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2012-11-07 16:53, tim.lauridsen@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@gmail.com
Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review is, well, somewhat formal. That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this issue. If you just make some new review requests, linking to the previous review I'll guess this could be handled without to much problems.
I don't see anywhere in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
That a new review is needed,
It might be that you are right, dunno, this is just so weird. My point is just that three simple reviews might be less work than to discuss this until there is a Proper Solution.
This is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Cla...
especially: Deprecated packages require re-review if they are deprecated for more than two weeks or if there is no previous review of the package. Submit a review request (a new bugzilla ticket) and have the package approved by a reviewer as if it were new to Fedora. See the package review process for more information.
Pierre