On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:45:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
IMHO it is what the policy says, quite explicitly:
From https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_...
""" Cca six weeks before the Fedora N mass branching, packages that weren’t successfully rebuilt at least in Fedora N-2 are collected and weekly reminders are sent to affected maintainers and the Fedora devel mailing list.
Cca a week before the Fedora N mass branching, packages that weren’t successfully rebuilt at least in Fedora N-2 will be retired assuming there have been at least 5 warnings on the devel mailing list. The bug status has no effect on this retirement. This can be requested via a releng issue. """
When I included glibc32 in the list, it wasn't successfully rebuilt at least in Fedora 37.
We could argue what "successfully rebuilt" actually means, but when I wrote that policy, the spirit was "an actual built shipped to Fedora users" rather than "a Koschei rebuild".
Sure, but glibc32 is in fact never shipped to Fedora users. :)
We explicily block it in pungi so it never goes out. It's a buildsystem implementation detail.
I see you rebuilt it now, thanks.
Should I open a releng ticket to include this package in the next mass rebuild?
I suppose we could rebuild it, I don't think that would matter any? Or would it? Florian?
kevin