On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 16:31 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400 David Malcolm wrote: [snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing something like: foo/__pycache__ to capture the directory and the bytecode files within.
Unfortunately there is sometimes also a __pycache__ directory in %{python_sitearch} (etc...) - for example in python3-minimock:
Oops; good catch - thanks!
Looks like the python3 package needs to own this.
Toshio fixed this in python3-3.2-0.2.a1 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191446 (I only noticed this after trying to push my fix for this :( )
Yes; anything that installs any .py files into %{python_sitearch} should also be installing bytecode files into %{python_sitearch}/__pycache__ and if you install subdirectories, the subdirectories should themselves install a __pycache__ subdir.
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-minimock-1.2.5-5.fc15.noarch error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/__pycache__/minimock.cpython-32.pyc /usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/__pycache__/minimock.cpython-32.pyo Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/__pycache__/minimock.cpython-32.pyc /usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/__pycache__/minimock.cpython-32.pyo
I decided to *NOT* own the __pycache__ directory, because other python3 packages will have that directory too, so I _believe_ the main python3 package should own them, isn't it?
That sounds correct.
python3-minimock currently only owns: %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/minimock*
This seems correct.
Thanks! Dave