Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"AJ" == Adam Jackson ajackson@redhat.com writes:
AJ> Openchrome appears to be a complete superset of the existing via AJ> driver, which is unmaintained and in some cases actively broken. AJ> So I have no problem with openchrome actively claiming devices.
yes, openchrome is based on what used to be the via xorg driver.
So then should the existing via driver stop claiming them? Otherwise don't we start running into unspecified behavior when multiple .xinf files claim a device?
- J<
My understanding is openchrome will only claim a device if it's manually installed (obviously), and if the user invokes system-config-display again after that. Does this make sense ?
Regards, Xavier