On 29/04/11 00:37, MichaĆ Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir is directly under /.
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance?
These are two separate issues. /srv tends to prevent people creating top level mounts, so I would definitely keep it.