10:11 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
contacted the
upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
some gnustep stuff like EToile may works only in the llvm environment.
So I would like to ask, if there any reason, which may blokcks this step
for F-17.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAk8W7y4ACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+YVwP/Yi6WwQZ1HPJkzYai1KG18xR5
gKyztBRUjBuSV07cGSzuXGSIPzAM5DJbeT56QyMBPbiuWeyCf78ql45r/FwEA1SY
yxFywmYrEvpcn2dHuTdYwhEyHTu9oen8a8vFHPgjhwhV/C9k/CMNOQwC/WizE5+5
k3CYP5vVDN7rnZH4+V0=
=Ls1t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10:25 a.m.
On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
contacted the
upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
some gnustep stuff like EToile may works only in the llvm environment.
So I would like to ask, if there any reason, which may blokcks this step
for F-17.
It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
other arches.
Andrew.
10:53 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
other arches.
The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
found.
So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAk8W+REACgkQZLAIBz9lVu9nSAP+LbHFgOlZH5+8od60ABukcUcX
ESJHsLN0BR4v3haCCUUk6Tq9VtHV5uz55g488/XI1uHvabCFUtFYt8wOMiGviGOg
FHh5i+r49NrcdWwSctjEFh8z+QhB+X48/SWg+BFWHocOYjQSPI+iDg6mBZE4u6OG
GtotVkgNUMT+zy6zDek=
=wrqw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10:57 a.m.
On 01/18/2012 04:53 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On 18.01.2012 17:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 01/18/2012 04:11 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> > It might be more helpful to tell us what these issues are. While
> > LLVM might well be OK on x86, I'm less convinced about support for
> > other arches.
The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
found.
So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue.
Right, so it's probably not a gcc issue but a real bug in
gnustep.
Andrew.
11:03 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
> found.
>
> So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue.
Right, so it's probably not a gcc issue but a real bug in
gnustep.
The cited file objc/objc-api.h was provided by the gcc-objc package and
was removed by gcc-4.7.0, so the reason for my issue depends on the
gcc-4.7.0 packages.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAk8W+0kACgkQZLAIBz9lVu9zEAQAtiKbEBPjsRIqk8X3qpFsIu/S
Z6Tn0IPN5vSAQsPnT/Bj1moCeZja8RXTPZxMhw2Vh+OZp1O5sB7WjG2ybU4zgd6h
Fa1dsWvYP4wINwRsgZ8eqnq6sFsDjyW0spZnrVjNMrtRpe0MkckS5BswMIs3aagq
nNp/+mXC5wl5ekxUl54=
=N8Xr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11:10 a.m.
On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
>> >> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>> >> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>> >> found.
>> >>
>> >> So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue.
> >
> > Right, so it's probably not a gcc issue but a real bug in
> > gnustep.
> >
> >
The cited file objc/objc-api.h was provided by the gcc-objc package and
was removed by gcc-4.7.0, so the reason for my issue depends on the
gcc-4.7.0 packages.
Ah, right. The old Objective-C runtime API has been removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00571.html
And, I guess the gnustep maintainers don't want to update. I
suppose there's not much choice for the time being.
Andrew.
11:51 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 18:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/18/2012 05:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Ah, right. The old Objective-C runtime API has been removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00571.html And, I guess the
gnustep maintainers don't want to update. I suppose there's not much
choice for the time being. Andrew.
Yes, one issue is, that they provide a package called gnustep-objc which
provides
an Objective-C runtime.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAk8XBpEACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+7QwP/bkquzLFEYrhcqPcW2aQ05X4Q
29TtqYUuWoufi+tDNRw4L1SCNykunxjY7ymKP41bfJEJrYbDpRwSqpgyupmZqNnk
H1rBQuJ+Vs2+IwRmG+piMBXD4ukYpN48kg4DgUXVwU5j+ih3D6uv7+ZV3ID6Jbje
Xkpqj74+DT0JkwRYjJY=
=+i41
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11:10 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18.01.2012 17:57, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> The issue was, that during thu build of gnustep-base I have got a
>> error messag which told me, that the file objc/objc-api.h was not
>> found.
>>
>> So I have ask upstream for support to solve this issue.
>
> Right, so it's probably not a gcc issue but a real bug in
> gnustep.
>
>
The cited file objc/objc-api.h was provided by the gcc-objc package and
was removed by gcc-4.7.0, so the reason for my issue depends on the
gcc-4.7.0 packages.
GCC 4.6 objc-api.h said:
/* This file declares the "traditional" GNU Objective-C Runtime API.
It is the API supported by older versions of the GNU Objective-C
Runtime. Include this file to use it.
This API is being replaced by the "modern" GNU Objective-C Runtime
API, which is declared in objc/runtime.h. The "modern" API is very
similar to the API used by the modern Apple/NeXT runtime.
The last version of GCC supporting the traditional API is GCC 4.6.
This file will not exist in later versions of GCC.
Because the two APIs have some conflicting definitions (in
particular, Method and Category are defined differently) you should
include either objc/objc-api.h (to use the traditional GNU
Objective-C Runtime API) or objc/runtime.h (to use the modern GNU
Objective-C Runtime API), but not both. */
so it is surprising that gnustep maintainers didn't bother to do anything
to move toward objc/runtime.h. And it surprises me that clang actually
didn't remove that header too, I'd have thought that Nicola Pero
removed it because it was gone in clang/llvm too.
Jakub
11:19 a.m.
On 01/18/2012 05:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
so it is surprising that gnustep maintainers didn't bother to do
anything
to move toward objc/runtime.h. And it surprises me that clang actually
didn't remove that header too, I'd have thought that Nicola Pero
removed it because it was gone in clang/llvm too.
I guess we should ask Nicola.
Andrew.
1:23 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I have got issues with the gcc-4.7 compiler suite i have
contacted the
upstream of the gnustep project to get a solution for my issues.
He has adviced me to migrate the gnustep stuff to clang/llvm. Espeicially
some gnustep stuff like EToile may works only in the llvm environment.
So I would like to ask, if there any reason, which may blokcks this step
for F-17.
Yes, there is. The Fedora-packaged clang does not work at all because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750187 . There is another
C++-specific bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729308),
but I guess that is not a problem for you.
D.
4481
days inactive
4482
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andrew Haley -
David Tardon -
Jakub Jelinek -
Jochen Schmitt