Hi,
I could not help noticing gtestutils.h from glib2-2.15.0-4 is not a standard C header file: it contains C++-style // comments. This breaks building my package (balsa). Should I work around this problem or a more up to date glib2 release is planned? I see the problem with the header has been fixed in glib2 on 2007-12-21.
Pawel
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 12:09:47AM +0100, Pawel Salek wrote:
I could not help noticing gtestutils.h from glib2-2.15.0-4 is not a standard C header file: it contains C++-style // comments. This breaks building my package (balsa). Should I work around this problem or a more up to date glib2 release is planned? I see the problem with the header has been fixed in glib2 on 2007-12-21.
Just small correction, // comments are standard ISO C99, just not ISO C89 (and even there accepted as GNU extension in (the default) -std=gnu89 mode).
Jakub
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:09 +0100, Pawel Salek wrote:
Hi,
I could not help noticing gtestutils.h from glib2-2.15.0-4 is not a standard C header file: it contains C++-style // comments. This breaks building my package (balsa). Should I work around this problem or a more up to date glib2 release is planned? I see the problem with the header has been fixed in glib2 on 2007-12-21.
No need to go all the way to C++, it is C99... As you notice, it has already been fixed, and 2.15.1 should appear in rawhide tomorrow (I am waiting for a new gvfs release to avoid breaking the desktop unnecessarily)