Announcing pungi-0.1.0

[Jesse Keating]

I am pleased (and scared) to announce the 0.1.0 release of pungi.  This is the 
first release and thus it is a bit rough around the edges, but I firmly 
believe in release early release often.

With this release pungi has the ability to gather packages and their deps from 
a given repo or set of repos, run anaconda tools to make installable trees, 
and create CD and DVD isos (DVD only if you ask for more than one CD).  I 
have included some reference config files and a comps file I have been using 
to develop with.  Currently pungi needs to be ran on the architecture you are 
composing for, although one could use mock with setarch as well.  See README 
for more details on design and usage of pungi.

To download pungi, visit http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi/release/ and 
pick up either the tarball, the source rpm, or the Fedora Core 6 binary rpm.  
Mercurial repo is http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi  Discussion regarding 
the use or development of pungi happens on the fedora-buildsys-list mailing 
list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list  Currently 
bugs are not tracked anywhere other than my inbox, I will most likely rectify 
this situation soon, but for now email works.

Enjoy!

[Neal Becker]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> I am pleased (and scared) to announce the 0.1.0 release of pungi.  This is
> the first release and thus it is a bit rough around the edges, but I
> firmly believe in release early release often.
>
> With this release pungi has the ability to gather packages and their deps
> from a given repo or set of repos, run anaconda tools to make installable
> trees,
> and create CD and DVD isos (DVD only if you ask for more than one CD).  I
> have included some reference config files and a comps file I have been
> using
> to develop with.  Currently pungi needs to be ran on the architecture you
> are
> composing for, although one could use mock with setarch as well.  See
> README for more details on design and usage of pungi.
>
> To download pungi, visit http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi/release/ and
> pick up either the tarball, the source rpm, or the Fedora Core 6 binary
> rpm.
> Mercurial repo is http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi  Discussion
> regarding the use or development of pungi happens on the
> fedora-buildsys-list mailing
> list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list 
> Currently bugs are not tracked anywhere other than my inbox, I will most
> likely rectify this situation soon, but for now email works.
>
> Enjoy!

Cool.

In README, should that test be --version 6.89, rather than --release 6.89?

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 08 November 2006 20:55, Neal Becker wrote:
> In README, should that test be --version 6.89, rather than --release 6.89?

Hahah, good catch!  I'll fix in hg.

[Dario Lesca]

Il giorno mer, 08/11/2006 alle 20.38 -0500, Jesse Keating ha scritto:
> Enjoy!

I have test the utilities but I get this error:
> [lesca@lesca work]$ sudo rpm -ivh pungi-0.1.0-1.fc6.noarch.rpm
> Password:
> Preparing...        ########################################### [100%]
>    1:pungi          ########################################### [100%]
> [lesca@lesca work]$ pungi
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/pungi", line 100, in ?
>     main()
>   File "/usr/bin/pungi", line 24, in main
>     pkglist = get_packagelist(opts.comps)
>   File "/usr/bin/pungi", line 92, in get_packagelist
>     print >> sys.stderr, "pungi: No such file:'%s'" % opts.comps
> NameError: global name 'opts' is not defined
> [lesca@lesca work]$ cat /etc/issue
> Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux)
> Kernel \r on an \m

What's wrong?

Many thanks

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 09 November 2006 05:55, Dario Lesca wrote:
> What's wrong?

pungi takes a lot of options to run, see the README file.  Apparently I forgot 
to wire up a usage spew... (:

[Neal Becker]

Tried the test.  Just went round in circles saying "finding deps for ..." or
some words to that effect.  I let it run overnight.  Never got out of that
loop.

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 09 November 2006 06:29, Neal Becker wrote:
> Tried the test.  Just went round in circles saying "finding deps for ..."
> or some words to that effect.  I let it run overnight.  Never got out of
> that loop.

What arch did you run it on, and did you change the comps file at all?

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 09 November 2006 08:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 06:29, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Tried the test.  Just went round in circles saying "finding deps for ..."
> > or some words to that effect.  I let it run overnight.  Never got out of
> > that loop.
>
> What arch did you run it on, and did you change the comps file at all?

oh wait, I forgot about this.  There was/is a bug in yum that made package 
comparison not work quite right.  It was fixed upstream and I thought we 
issued an update for FC6 that would resolve this.

Seth?  Jeremy?

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 08:36 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 08:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 November 2006 06:29, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Tried the test.  Just went round in circles saying "finding deps for ..."
> > > or some words to that effect.  I let it run overnight.  Never got out of
> > > that loop.
> >
> > What arch did you run it on, and did you change the comps file at all?
>
> oh wait, I forgot about this.  There was/is a bug in yum that made package 
> comparison not work quite right.  It was fixed upstream and I thought we 
> issued an update for FC6 that would resolve this.

1. it was in 3.0-6
2. it's included in the yum 3.0.1 release tarball.

-sv

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 09 November 2006 08:51, seth vidal wrote:
> it was in 3.0-6

Actually I just verified that it missed 3.0-6.  My test box had yum patched 
locally :/
> it's included in the yum 3.0.1 release tarball.

I'm asking our yum maintainer(s) to issue an update for FC-6 so that this will 
work correctly.  It should work in rawhide too.

[David Nielsen]

ons, 08 11 2006 kl. 20:38 -0500, skrev Jesse Keating:
> I am pleased (and scared) to announce the 0.1.0 release of pungi.  This is the 
> first release and thus it is a bit rough around the edges, but I firmly 
> believe in release early release often.
>
> With this release pungi has the ability to gather packages and their deps from 
> a given repo or set of repos, run anaconda tools to make installable trees, 
> and create CD and DVD isos (DVD only if you ask for more than one CD).  I 
> have included some reference config files and a comps file I have been using 
> to develop with.  Currently pungi needs to be ran on the architecture you are 
> composing for, although one could use mock with setarch as well.  See README 
> for more details on design and usage of pungi.
>
> To download pungi, visit http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi/release/ and 
> pick up either the tarball, the source rpm, or the Fedora Core 6 binary rpm.  
> Mercurial repo is http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi  Discussion regarding 
> the use or development of pungi happens on the fedora-buildsys-list mailing 
> list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list  Currently 
> bugs are not tracked anywhere other than my inbox, I will most likely rectify 
> this situation soon, but for now email works.
>
> Enjoy!

Can one assume you will submit pungi for Extras?

- David

[José Abílio Matos]

On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:53 am, David Nielsen wrote:
> Can one assume you will submit pungi for Extras?

It is there already, and it was approved today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730
> David