On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:24:45 +0100 Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net> wrote:
Nope, those packages are already all made for "development"
So that the fc4 label in binary rpms name: gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.0.1-1.2.fc4.1.i386.rpm is ininfluent and one can install on rawhide as is?
Gianluca Cecchi wrote :
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:24:45 +0100 Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net> wrote:
Nope, those packages are already all made for "development"
So that the fc4 label in binary rpms name: gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.0.1-1.2.fc4.1.i386.rpm is ininfluent and one can install on rawhide as is?
It's not "fc4", it's "fc4.1" so that the main part of the release doesn't need to be bumped once the final rebuild with "fc5" will happen ;-)
Matthias