Re: wmii window manager

[Adam Miller]

Doesn't it mention somewhere in the wmii documentation that wmii is not
intended for packaging because many of the user configuration options are to
be set in a header file pre compile? I could be wrong but seem to remember
reading that about both wmii and ion.

-Adam
> From Android

On Oct 3, 2009 8:52 AM, "Rahul Sundaram"  wrote:

On 10/03/2009 07:15 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > >> Would you like to
begin packaging it ? > > S...
More or less. Refer to

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers

Feel free to ask if you need more help. A number of existing
contributors will be willing to guide you.

Rahul

--

fedora-devel-list mailing list [e-mail]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/...

wmii window manager

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 12:04 -0500 schrieb Adam Miller:
> Doesn't it mention somewhere in the wmii documentation that wmii is
> not intended for packaging because many of the user configuration
> options are to be set in a header file pre compile? I could be wrong
> but seem to remember reading that about both wmii and ion.

That was dwm, which is also hosted at suckless.org and from the same
author IIRC:
"Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s
pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small
and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions."

http://dwm.suckless.org/
> -Adam

Regards,
Christoph

wmii window manager

[Ilyes Gouta]

Hi,

wmii requires dmenu, libixp-0.4 and p9p. Packages for Debian already
exist. I guess it's doable for Fedora too.

Regards,
Ilyes Gouta.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Christoph Wickert
 wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 12:04 -0500 schrieb Adam Miller:
> > Doesn't it mention somewhere in the wmii documentation that wmii is
> > not intended for packaging because many of the user configuration
> > options are to be set in a header file pre compile? I could be wrong
> > but seem to remember reading that about both wmii and ion.
>
> That was dwm, which is also hosted at suckless.org and from the same
> author IIRC:
> "Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s
> pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small
> and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions."
>
> http://dwm.suckless.org/
> > -Adam
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list