Hi
If anyone needs add to the list, kindly file a RFE against bugzilla itself in http://bugzilla.redhat.com and reply to this mail with the report link retaining the CC list. We could take a look at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-December/msg00057.htm... and http://bugzilla.gnome.org for other ideas.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79625 – Use milestones instead of tracking bugs. (policy change)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168000 - Bugs with NEEDINFO should be auto closed after 3 weeks with a comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169746 -Dupe detection.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181524 - Make searching for duplicates search closed bugs as well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91306 - Private field for setting developer priority
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111799 - Is "Red Hat Raw Hide" product obsolete?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151781 - "Add me to CC list" as default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54231 - Ability to append comments via Email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166174 - Better name for "MODIFIED" status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118070 - Using Bugzilla as a repository for release notes feedback...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92088 - default to "auto-detect" in the create attachments screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164763 -– "steps to reproduce" field should not be mandatory if enhancement is selected.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137034 - Need an owner per release/component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154357 - Kill the spam spiders on Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132004 - QA contact was removed instead of my email added to cc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137433 - "Add bug to my list" for "This bug is not in your list"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568 - – Time stamps say "UTC", but are really in Eastern
Not sure where put put it, but i find that one of the reasons bz is hard to find duplicates in, are because the "devel" version under "fedora core" product, for example, is not about bugs in current rawhide, as expected, but has bugs that dates back to the "old days" making "devel" a wierd moving target and test-x almost outdated on release, since most testers will be using rawhide anyways.
Perhaps there could be some refinement useful here???
/Thomas
Hi.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:22:53 +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
Not sure where put put it, but i find that one of the reasons bz is hard to find duplicates in, are because the "devel" version under "fedora core" product, for example, is not about bugs in current rawhide, as expected, but has bugs that dates back to the "old days"
I'm sorry? I was under the impression that FC->Devel was the category tracking, well FC devel, which is what rawhide was some years ago.
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:22:53 +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
Not sure where put put it, but i find that one of the reasons bz is hard to find duplicates in, are because the "devel" version under "fedora core" product, for example, is not about bugs in current rawhide, as expected, but has bugs that dates back to the "old days"
I'm sorry? I was under the impression that FC->Devel was the category tracking, well FC devel, which is what rawhide was some years ago.
FC devel is still referred to as rawhide on many occations - but since test X releases are effectively snapshots of rawhide at a somewhat stable point in time, picking the right distribution for querying for already reported bugs becomes just a little less straight forward... All reports filed under FC devel are still there - even bugs reported against Pre FC 1 test releases... Again - recently released test X releases (pre FC5 for example) could just as well have had bugs repported against rawhide, since we're updating from the devel tree anyways, during the testing.
I'm merely suggesting that something could be done to make this a little clearer. I'll probably survive myself, but I have had the doubtful honor of filing a duplicate BZ or two (because i was not able to find the existing BZs, perhaps because of this).
/Thomas
-
Rahul Sundaram -
Ralf Ertzinger -
Thomas M Steenholdt