"Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid
syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"
by Richard W.M. Jones
What does it mean?
Rich.
----- Forwarded message from updates(a)fedoraproject.org -----
The following comment has been added to the libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26 update:
bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma: 0)
Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)
To reply to this comment, please visit the URL at the bottom of this mail
================================================================================
libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26
================================================================================
Update ID: FEDORA-2018-49cd53ff36
Release: Fedora 26
Status: testing
Type: bugfix
Karma: 0
Critpath: True
Request: batched
Notes: New upstream version 1.36.13. Drop libguestfs-gobject-doc because
: gtk-doc is no longer provided upstream. Add new man
: page guestfs-gobject(3) to libguestfs-gobject-devel.
Submitter: rjones
Submitted: 2018-01-26 10:55:45.451633
Comments: bodhi - 2018-01-26 10:55:45.460315 (karma 0)
This update has been submitted for testing by rjones.
bodhi - 2018-01-26 19:12:36.703507 (karma 0)
This update has been pushed to testing.
bodhi - 2018-02-10 00:00:23.804844 (karma 0)
This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be
pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
bodhi - 2018-02-10 07:32:25.932908 (karma 0)
This update has been submitted for batched by rjones.
bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma 0)
Bodhi is unable to request this update for
stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-49cd53ff36
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
6 years, 3 months
HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide
by Sandro Mani
Hi
Per GifLib5 change [1] I plan to start updating to giflib-5.1.4 tomorrow
evening. I'll start by building giflib-5.1.4 and then follow with the
transition package compat-giflib-4-1.6, which will provide the old
giflib-4.x dependency during the transition to giflib-5.x. Subsequently,
I'll rebuild the following packages
efl
emacs
fbida
fontforge
imlib2
kdelibs
kf5-khtml
leptonica
libextractor
libgdiplus
librasterlite2
ming
mtpaint
ocaml-camlimages
OpenSceneGraph
perl-Imager
perl-Prima
python-gd
sxiv
tracker-miners
vips
WindowMaker
xemacs
xplanet
driftnet
metapixel
MagicPoint
java-1.8.0-openjdk
java-9-openjdk
libwebp
gdal
mapserver
OpenImageIO
mathgl
I won't be porting/rebuilding imlib to/against giflib-5.x since its only
requiree is MagicPoint, which builds against imlib2, so I believe it
should just be retired.
Thanks
Sandro
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GifLib5
6 years, 3 months
Re: Give us a feedback on API situation
by Pavel Raiskup
Forwarding to Fedora devel. User perspective (API v1 vs. v2) is important.
Pavel
On Monday, February 12, 2018 11:17:26 PM CET Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello,
> we are currently discussing how to deal with the current situation of
> inconsistent Copr API.
>
> If you are interested in this topic and want to give us some feedback,
> please see the https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/218
>
> COPR team
6 years, 3 months
OpenImageIO GCC 8 build problem?
by Richard Shaw
A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
Error during build[1]:
*** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug
unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
Event | Plugins
PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT | annobin: Generate final annotations
PLUGIN_START_UNIT | annobin: Generate global annotations
PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END | annobin: Generate per-function
annotations
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/include/
OpenImageIO/imageio.h:59,
from /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/include/
OpenImageIO/imagebuf.h:46,
from /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/
libOpenImageIO/imagebufalgo_compare.cpp:41:
/builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/libOpenImageIO/imagebufalgo_compare.cpp:
In instantiation of 'bool OpenImageIO_v1_8::color_count_(const
OpenImageIO_v1_8::ImageBuf&, OpenImageIO_v1_8::atomic_ll*, int, const
float*, const float*, OpenImageIO_v1_8::ROI, int) [with T = float;
OpenImageIO_v1_8::atomic_ll = std::atomic<long long int>]':
/builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/libOpenImageIO/imagebufalgo_compare.cpp:546:5:
required from here
/builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/include/OpenImageIO/platform.h:191:36:
internal compiler error: in maybe_undo_parenthesized_ref, at
cp/semantics.c:1736
#define ALLOCA(type, size) ((size) != 0 ? ((type*)alloca((size) * sizeof
(type))) : nullptr)
~~~~~~~^~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1.8.8/src/libOpenImageIO/imagebufalgo_compare.cpp:501:24:
note: in expansion of macro 'ALLOCA'
long long *n = ALLOCA (long long, ncolors);
^~~~~~
Ideas?
Thanks,
Richard
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24761376
6 years, 3 months
KDE print dialog does not see CUPS settings
by Marcel Oliver
Hallo,
I am posting the following to the devel list because it's an annoying
bug, but I have no idea which component is reponsible to file a bug
report on bugzilla...
Since I upgraded to F27, the KDE print dialog (for me the most
relevant application is okular) fails to see the available printer
options, nor does it see the printer defaults. It also does not save
changed settings from one print job to the next. Other applications
(firefox, libreoffice, evince, ...) see the CUPS settings just fine.
This happens on the cinnamon desktop (Fedora cinnamon spin).
I do not know if this is a KDE problem, a problem with KDE integration
in Fedora in general, or with the cinnamon spin in particular, or
possibly related to CUPS, but would be willing to help debug the
issue.
It's not really serious, but pretty annoying and a regression of
something which definitely worked without issues for many years.
Regards,
Marcel
6 years, 3 months
mock slow to get new packages for Rawhide?
by Richard Shaw
With the recent gcc 8 issues I've been trying to do some build tests on my
system but I keep getting
gcc-8.0.1-0.9.fc28 even after performing a --scrub=all instead of
gcc-8.0.1-0.13.fc28 which was built yesterday or even gcc-8.0.1-0.12.fc28
from the 9th...
What gives? It can't just be slow mirror propagation...
Thanks,
Richard
6 years, 3 months
Please review use /$ in %files (Was: Re: Escaping macros in %changelog)
by Tomasz Kłoczko
BTW some massively occurring errors in really big number Fedora of specs.
Looks like many people don't know that %files entry like:
/some/directory/
does not include /some/directory into package but all files and
subdirectories which are in /some/directory.
This is in how many specs such lines are used:
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep ^%\{.*\/$ * | grep -v __ | awk -F\.
'{print $1}' | uniq| wc -l
4827
There is
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep ^%\{.*\/$ * | grep -v __ | wc -l
17762
such entries in all fedora spec files.
What it is causing such mistake everyone can check by executing
$ (for i in /usr/{lib64,exec,share}; do find $i -name \*; done) 2>&1 |
xargs rpm -qf |grep "is not owned by any package"
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH <http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH>*
6 years, 3 months
