Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
by Vít Ondruch
Hi,
Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
and not using --nogpgcheck?
It seems that Rawhide keys were added in fedora-repos-30-0.4. So this is
the package which is still "rawhide" package and has "f31" keys. But
this package was not probably signed, because this directory is empty:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.4/data/signed/
Installing anything from Rawhide fails, because of missing GPG keys.
So is there a way to get the GPG keys via DNF? Would it be possible to
sign fedora-repos and fedora-release packages by older key to allow
smooth updates?
Vít
4 years, 8 months
when will bodhi (updates) recognize fc31/f31 updates
by Kaleb Keithley
I've tried to submit a build on f31 to testing, using both the cli and via
the web site, and both are failing
On the web site I get a popup with: Builds : Cannot find release associated
with build: nfs-ganesha-2.8.2-5.fc31, tags: ['f31']
fedpkg update gets: Could not execute update: Could not generate update
request: Cannot find release associated with build:
nfs-ganesha-2.8.2-5.fc31, tags: ['f31']
Thanks
--
Kaleb
4 years, 8 months
Re: Request for write permission of menu-cache in Fedora
by Zamir SUN
Ping for updates.
I've build menu-cach 1.1.0 in Copr and already tested against LXQt.
If you are not willing to grant me write permission, can you build this
in EPEL directly?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zsun/epel7/build/948489/
On 7/15/19 1:58 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Ping for updates.
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:59 PM Zamir SUN <sztsian(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> I am the current maintainer of Fedora LXQt spin. Recently I am updating
>> LXQt in EPEL and I found that I need menu-cache 1.1.0 in EPEL. I filed a
>> bug there[1] but no updates. I checked and see only LXQt uses menu-cache
>> in EPEL, so can you please grant me write permission of menu-cache, so
>> that I can update it in EPEL myself?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724495
>> --
>> Zamir SUN
>> Fedora user
>> GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
--
Zamir SUN
Fedora user
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
4 years, 8 months
not sending emails for the semiannual rawhide→branched bug assignment update
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Bugzilla now has "This is a minor update (do not send email)" checkbox in the
web interface. I hope the same setting is available through the API.
When bugs are reassigned (e.g. the recent rawhide→F31 reassignment), maybe
this could be used to not send mail notifications?
Zbyszek
4 years, 8 months
Missing arches on EPEL 8 for LibRaw?
by Richard Shaw
I assume this is because LibRaw is available in RHEL but only for x86_64
and ppc64le?
So I'm assuming there is some sort of procedure to build only for s390x and
aarch64 for EPEL?
Thanks,
Richard
4 years, 8 months
orphaning some packages
by Casper
Dear Fedora Developpers,
due of lack of time, I'm orphaning most of my packages:
* asterisk-gui (upstream is dead)
* bvi
* checkdns
* dnstracer
* easybashgui
* exif
* libexif-gtk
* mined
* xinput_calibrator
* Xnee
regards,
Matthieu Saulnier
--
Clé GPG: 0x29F0BEF2 @ hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org
Empreinte: 70D5 A9B1 84EB 45F2 C7A3 18AB AE15 7E0B 29F0 BEF2
« Ceux qui peuvent renoncer à la liberté essentielle pour obtenir un
peu de sécurité temporaire, ne méritent ni la liberté ni la
sécurité. »
~~ Memoirs of the life and writings of Benjamin Franklin (1818)
x509 CA: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/root.pem
Empreinte: 0975 864A 2036 0F94 A139 114A D32E 8EBE 30F2 2429
4 years, 8 months
gsoap updated in rawhide
by Mattias Ellert
The gsoap package was updated in rawhide to version 2.8.91. As always
for this package there is a soname bump.
The following dependent packages were rebuild by me:
CGSI-gSOA
voms
The following dependent packages need to be rebuilt. Maintainers in cc:
davix
dmlite
fts
glite-lb-server
glite-lbjp-common-gsoap-plugin
gridsite
lcgdm
lcgdm-dav
srm-ifce
Mattias
4 years, 8 months
looking to orphan docker-distribution..
by Lokesh Mandvekar
I'm looking to give up ownership of the docker-distribution package.
Current co-maintainers aren't keen on owning it either, but I heard
registry.fp.o depends on it.
So, just checking if anyone would like to own it before I orphan it.
--
Lokesh
IRC, GitHub: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
https://keybase.io/lsm5
4 years, 8 months
