devel May 2021

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

211 participants
366 discussions

nokey warning during F33->F34 upgrade (fstrm package)
by Germano Massullo 03 May '21

03 May '21

After running dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34 and downloading all files, I got the following warning warning: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-e21c25ac3662d294/packages/fstrm-0.6.0-4.fc34.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, ID key 45719a39: NOKEY Why this package does not have a key? Cheers

4 7

Re: KDE Autostart in F34
by Rex Dieter 03 May '21

03 May '21

Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I hope there are some KDE experts on the list who can help me debug this - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953472. > > It looks like KDE in Fedora 34 is not honoring open-vm-tools autostart > script in /etc/xdg/autostart/vmware-user.desktop. GNOME seems to work > fine. > > Could you please confirm if KDE supports autostart scripts from > /etc/xdg/autostart dir? If yes, is there a regression in F34? kde plasma on f34 uses systemd user session and systemd-xdg-autostart- generator, so yes, autostart is supported (but this new method has some quirks). I commented in the bug with some debugging steps to try. -- Rex

4 3

Re: KDE Autostart in F34
by Benjamin Berg 03 May '21

03 May '21

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:03 +0000, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, > > IMO. > > Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. > I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. Yeah, you might want to ship both a systemd unit and an XDG autostart file for the time being. There will still be graphical desktops environments which are not started using systemd in the foreseeable future. If you decide to ship both, please add X-GNOME-HiddenUnderSystemd=true and X-systemd-hidden=true to the desktop file to prevent the service from getting started twice. If the ExitType= patch fixes this, then the problem is that the generated service does not handle forking services right now and it will work fine with systemd v249 and later. Benjamin

2 1

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210503.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 03 May '21

03 May '21

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210502.0): ID: 876465 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876465 ID: 876472 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876472 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210503.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 03 May '21

03 May '21

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210502.0): ID: 876395 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876395 ID: 876402 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876402 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Flatpak install and DNF removal
by Ian McInerney 03 May '21

03 May '21

I was just experimenting after poking at this bug http s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847265, and I found some interesting behavior. This is how to reproduce it: 1) Use the Cinnamon live CD 2) Install a random flatpak (note, since this is on live you have to deal with the space issue first) sudo ostree --repo=/var/lib/flatpak/repo/ config set core.min-free-space-size 0MB sudo flatpak install org.gnome.Mahjongg 3) Remove xdg-desktop-portal-gtk In step 3 it will also want to remove flatpak, but in step 2 I made a conscious choice to install a flatpak - so this will then mean I lose access to that flatpak I had installed. This can of course be prevented by doing "dnf mark install flatpak", but that is another manual step you have to do. This leads to the question: how can this be handled? When a user uses Flatpak to install a program, I would assume their expectation is that flatpak shouldn't be removed unless the user requests it explicitly (so not this behavior). I guess there are 2 ways to really fix this: 1) Mark flatpak as being user installed once at least one flatpak is installed. 2) Add flatpak as an explicit program on all live CDs it is included on right now. The cleanest would probably be 1, but can that even be done? -Ian

2 1

Unresponsive maintainer for genders package
by Trey Dockendorf 03 May '21

03 May '21

I'd like to report what I think is an unresponsive maintainer for the genders package. Per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package… I filed this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955798 There do not appear to be any other bugs open for this package. I am starting this process in hopes of getting EPEL8 builds done for genders. I would be happy to take on the package as a maintainer if needed. I am also hoping to get this into EPEL8 so that I can also get powerman into EPEL8 which I believe depends on genders. Thanks, - Trey

4 4

Packages in need of a new maintainer
by Johannes Lips 02 May '21

02 May '21

Dear all, after quite some years, I would like to hand over the following packages to new maintainers. I will not orphan them if no one picks them up, but it would be great if someone with an interest in these packages could take them over. backintime - backintime backup tool elementary-icon-theme - Icons from the Elementary Project elementary-xfce-icon-theme - Icons for Xfce based on the elementary Project Icon Theme texstudio - A feature-rich editor for LaTeX documents I am still using these, but the burden of doing package maintenance besides my day job and personal stuff is too high. Thanks in advance for any volunteers johannes

4 6

Fedora-Rawhide-20210502.n.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 02 May '21

02 May '21

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/127 (aarch64), 13/189 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210501.n.0): ID: 876174 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876174 ID: 876186 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876186 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210501.n.0): ID: 875871 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875871 ID: 875899 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875899 ID: 875900 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875900 ID: 875930 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875930 ID: 875938 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875938 ID: 875949 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875949 ID: 875959 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875959 ID: 875991 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875991 ID: 876014 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876014 ID: 876015 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876015 ID: 876053 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876053 ID: 876082 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876082 ID: 876104 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876104 ID: 876117 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876117 ID: 876136 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876136 ID: 876139 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876139 ID: 876148 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876148 ID: 876163 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876163 ID: 876169 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876169 ID: 876182 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876182 ID: 876184 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876184 Soft failed openQA tests: 4/127 (aarch64), 1/189 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210501.n.0): ID: 876054 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876054 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210501.n.0): ID: 875981 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875981 ID: 875982 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875982 ID: 876036 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876036 ID: 876063 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876063 Passed openQA tests: 175/189 (x86_64), 113/127 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210501.n.0): ID: 875911 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875911 ID: 875922 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875922 ID: 876056 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876056 ID: 876093 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876093 ID: 876129 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876129 ID: 876158 Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876158 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libqrtr-glib System load changed from 0.18 to 0.42 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874769#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875869#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libqrtr-glib Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874770#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875870#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.21 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874794#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875894#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libqrtr-glib Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874826#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875926#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 4 MiB to 5 MiB System load changed from 0.94 to 1.60 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874828#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875928#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 1.17 to 1.55 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874829#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875929#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 1.20 to 0.99 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874848#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875948#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 1.26 to 0.88 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874864#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875964#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libqrtr-glib Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874890#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/875990#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.48 to 0.37 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/874909#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/876009#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 1

Gnome Fractal and veloren/airshipper needed maintainer
by Fábio Rodrigues Ribeiro 02 May '21

02 May '21

Hello foks! I will candidate to maintain the fractal and veloren/airshipper package Fábio _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel May 2021