FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr
by Martin Gansser
Hi,
vdr plugin vdr-epg2vdr prints the following message to the log file [1]:
vdr[30484]: [30484] loading plugin: /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7
vdr[30484]: [30484] ERROR: /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr
runvdr[30484]: vdr: /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr
the reason is, that libpython3.10.so.1.0 isn't linked
when building this plugin [2] on my local computer, all is fine, the missing pyhton lib is linked.
$ ldd /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff4c79b000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007ff1caaa5000)
libcrypto.so.1.1 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1 (0x00007ff1ca7b7000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007ff1ca7ae000)
libtinyxml2.so.7 => /lib64/libtinyxml2.so.7 (0x00007ff1ca796000)
libmariadb.so.3 => /lib64/libmariadb.so.3 (0x00007ff1ca740000)
==>>>> libpython3.10.so.1.0 => /lib64/libpython3.10.so.1.0 (0x00007ff1ca3ee000) <<<<==
libjansson.so.4 => /lib64/libjansson.so.4 (0x00007ff1ca3dc000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007ff1ca1bd000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007ff1ca1a2000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff1c9f98000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff1cac40000)
libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007ff1c9f7e000)
libssl.so.1.1 => /lib64/libssl.so.1.1 (0x00007ff1c9ee1000)
how can i solve this ?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047493
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vdr-epg2vdr/blob/rawhide/f/vdr-epg2vdr...
Regards
Martin
2 years, 3 months
Self Introduction: Chris Rapier
by rapier
Hello,
I'm Chris Rapier and I'm in the process of following the directions for
the inclusion of a new package into Fedora. I'm the primary developer of
hpn-ssh, a series of patches against OpenSSH to provide additional
functionality and performance to OpenSSH. I've been maintaining and
extending this code for 15 to 18 years now. I've worked on a number of
projects include web100 (which led to the development of autotuning
receive buffers), web10g, the visible human project, testrig2.0, and so
forth. All of the work I do is provided to the public with minimal
license restrictions (usually BSD).
We've been able to do a lot to make OpenSSH faster and more flexible for
a number of different communities over the years. While we primarily
focused on the high performance networking community (hence the hpn part
of the name) we've seen users in most every domain - from home users to
major corporations and governments. What we've never had is a package or
a place to easily distribute that package to the redhat community. I'm
hoping someone can take a look the request I've submitted and be willing
to sponsor me. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2047943
I work at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (part of Carnegie Mellon
University) as a research scientist and developer. hpn-ssh is one of the
first projects I took on solo. I've been fortunate enough to get support
for it over the years, most recently with a grant from the National
Science Foundation. I'm committed to maintaining this package for as
long as the community is interested in it (and then some).
Thanks for your time,
Chris Rapier
2 years, 3 months
Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec
by Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team,
It has been a while about default fedora backgrounds need a refresh. The
current method requires a package review for each release, which deemed
cumbersome.
One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of 10 Fedora
release wallpaper. The issue will be the increase of file size as the
Design Team chose to keep PNG format instead of JPG for the default
wallpaper.
Another idea is to have an umbrella of package named fxx-backgrounds as
an example containing subpackages including default and extras
wallpapers as illustrated below:
fxx-backgrounds as main package
f36-backgrounds-base and f36-backgrounds-extras as subpackages
The problem is I have no idea how to do that in spec format.
Feedback welcome.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
2 years, 3 months
dhcpd-pools failed rebuild
by Chris Adams
dhcpd-pools builds for Rawhide (in mock from F35) for me on x86_64, but
failed the mass rebuild on ppc64le with:
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:1032,
from ./stdlib.h:36,
from mktime.c:49:
/usr/include/bits/stdlib-ldbl.h: In function '__LDBL_REDIR1_DECL':
/usr/include/bits/stdlib-ldbl.h:35:1: error: expected declaration specifiers before '__LDBL_REDIR1_DECL'
35 | __LDBL_REDIR1_DECL (strtold_l, __strtoieee128_l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from mktime.c:44:
./stdlib.h:812:1: error: storage class specified for parameter '_gl_cxxalias_dummy'
812 | _GL_CXXALIASWARN (malloc);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[and a whole lot more from there]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1255/81481255/build.log
Is this something I need to fix, or is it a toolchain issue?
--
Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>
2 years, 3 months
mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25
by Kevin Fenzi
Greetings.
The mass rebuild finished it's first pass on saturday morning, leaving
3448 failed builds.
We then did a second pass yesterday ( 2022-01-24 ) of all failed builds,
and that resulted in 1282 failed builds.
The f36-rebuild tag is being merged now, but unfortunately our SOP had
it merge via f36-signing-pending, so all the builds will pass through
signing again, which will be a slow process. We have updated docs and
next time will be just tagging directly into the final tag and signing
along the way.
There's a gcc build currently going that has fixes for some common
issues that caused failures on ppc64le builds along with some other
fixes. As soon as it's done we are going to do another pass of
resubmitting the failed builds and will tag any that finish there.
After that we will be done and it will be on maintainers to sort out
FTBFS issues.
kevin
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedora...
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
2 years, 3 months
