No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220517.0):
ID: 1271463 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1271463
ID: 1271472 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1271472
Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
Hi,
I am trying to create a new package in Fedora: "zstd-jni"
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni
This would allow our package "apache-commons-compress" to use zstd
compression. Note that zstd-jni is a separate project from zstd. They
just add some jni C and Java librry to use them.
I am facing some issues: The upstream bundles sources of "zstd" project.
I believe that in Fedora this bundling is not justified. They only use
some internal headers, not .c files. Unfortunately most of these headers
are internal and not provided by "zstd-devel" package. Otherwise dynamic
linking to the installed "zstd" package is solved.
I can choose the following approaches:
1) Keep it bundled - simpler package maintenance, possibility of issues
if "zstd" shared library is updated and is incompatible with the current
bundled headers, duplicate fixing of CVEs.
2) Make "zstd" package expose internal headers either in "-devel"
subpackage or create a new "-internal" subpackage and copy those during
the build.
3) Somehow share the sources of the "zstd" source package in "zstd-jni"
package.
Moreover, how should Requires look like if i make the package
dynamically link to the Fedora zstd? Should i require exact version
match? Or a major / minor version match?
--
Marián Konček
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-05-17 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Nonresponsive maintainer: Konstantin Ryabitsev; icon
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2786
Self-approved by icon
Change proposal: Node.js 18.x by default
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2789
APPROVED (+4,0,-0)
= New business =
#2790 Election Interview Questions — FESCo (F36)
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2790
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Hi all,
I tried to contact Alfredo by email using his RH's address, but got no
answer from him nor a bounce from the server. It seems he has not been
an employee since 2020.
Checking with fedora_active_user:
Last login in FAS:
adeza 2019-12-16
ERROR:active-user:No such user: 'adeza'
Opened a non-responsive check BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087212
Does anyone know how to contact Alfredo by other means?
Kind regards,
Mikel Olasagasti (mikelo2)