Mike Klinke wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:30, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>No.. of course it can be improved.. I'm suggesting that your
>example does nothing but state the obvious fact that google has a
>better search algorithm than bugzilla... and the statement of
>that obvious fact doesn't help us identify how the bugzilla
>search can be made better specifically.
>
>
Because of the comparison Rahul noted that the difference was that
bugzilla defaults to looking at closed bugs only while Google looks
at everything it can find at the site.
I said bugzilla only looks at open reports by default. Not closed ones.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers