On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:53:43 -0400, Adam Jackson ajackson@redhat.com wrote:
There's a detail here for outputs, which is that we don't always do sensible things if we try to start X with no monitor attached, and for some KVMs it's tough to tell the difference between not attached and merely not active. That's just a bug though.
Or even when the code knows a monitor is attached, but it doesn't do EDID.