Steven Pritchard wrote :
Oops. That's what I get for just doing rpm -qp *-doc-* without looking at all of the descriptions. :-)
Matthias Saou wrote:
Not to mention that you missed all the *-docs-* packages ;-)
Mark Derricutt wrote:
Strike one for consistent naming :)
My thought exactly.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
- apache manual I think...
Most of the rest of the documentation packages already have the right group.
gnome-user-docs Documentation iiimf-docs Documentation postgresql-docs Applications/Databases python-docs Documentation ruby-docs Documentation httpd-manual Documentation
So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be renamed to *-docs)? Or maybe we should just make sure all of the packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still works (at least for apt).
Steve