-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2011 02:35 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 7.11.2011 22:12, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
> Having some public discussion of a potentially contentious
> feature is a great way to help fesco make decisions. I'm
> personally in favour of that happening on a mailing list rather
> than in the discussion page on a wiki - it's a lot easier to
> follow detailed conversation that way.
Sure, I am not against discussion here, but my experience (and some
literature[1]) tells me that discussion have better tendency to
succeed when they are around some exact proposal (which is not
written in stone and the author must be flexible to accept
criticism of course).
Best,
Matěj </end-of-this-subthread> --------------- References: [1]
Roger Fisher, William L. Ury, Bruce Patton: Getting to Yes:
Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In;
http://is.gd/LWZTfK
Well I threw one together.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ServicesPrivateTmp
If I propose 3 features for Fedora 17, do I win a prize?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SELinuxDenyPtrace
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Securecontainers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk65SKYACgkQrlYvE4MpobOVRgCeNcXpFZAbguRy0TwxTxg8OwlD
SY0AoJeJqD9i2OGYG+xzENQfa7bcdshQ
=j8WE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----