Re: Broken dependencies script at it again

[Mike McGrath]

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik  wrote:
>   Tom Lane writes:
>
>         Mike McGrath <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>               Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>
>               altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
>
>               breaks?
>
>         I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
>
>         that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
>
>
>   Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future.

Anyone on the list irritated enough to work on these scripts or just
irritated enough to complain via email and let it be someone else's
problem?

-Mike