On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 09:35 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:03:48PM +1300, Michael J Knox wrote:
The suggestion is to point to a set of "real" kernel includes instead of RH's glibc-kernheaders package.
Kernel includes should never be used from userspace.
Has anyone got some suggestions on what should be done about this or how to work around it (from a packaging standpoint) ?
If the glibc-kernheaders are insufficient, and snort is sticking to documented public interfaces, then glibc-kernheaders should be fixed to define those interfaces.
Ok, so do I go back to snort and find out whats what or does RH update glibc-kernheaders?
Michael