Bernardo Innocenti (bernie(a)codewiz.org) said:
On 08/28/2007 01:58 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bernardo Innocenti (bernie(a)codewiz.org) said:
>> If there are no resources to do it, I hereby volunteer
>> to do this work in due time, provided there's interest
>> from the current redhat-lsb maintainers to merge my
>> changes back.
>
> Taking patches, although I'd start with the stuff in /etc/init.d/functions.
Agreed. My idea was to start by moving only the parts
of code that LSB advertises from /etc/init.d/functions
to /lib/lsb/init-functions. Would that make sense?
Not unless lsb/init-functions moves to someplace that doesn't require the whole mess
of the lsb stack; we don't want init scripts bringing in the entirety of openssl,
X, cron, pax, shadow-utils, etc.
Bill