On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:38 PM Milan Crha mcrha@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
So I plan to go ahead with this rebase and rebuilding these packages after the mass rebuild if that's okay.
Hi,
does the new version change any API and/or soname version?
I don't think so and the test results look quite good actually (only neochat fails due to cmark-0.30.2): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/cmark/monitor/ (I think upstream is a bit conservative with still linking the SONAME to the version.)
so I think we can go ahead and push this to rawhide.
We can consider whether to backport to F37 and possibly F36 if needed afterwards.
I do not think you should change API/soname version in stable releases, that can lead to trouble (for example for 3rd-party packages).
You are right - let's not plan to do that yet, though I know one new dependent package newly needs 0.30.
Jens