No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete.
If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least it does to me.
Check it with:
rpm -ql fedora-gpg-keys | grep fedora-34-$(arch)
It just does not provide correct key. The same issue is there for f31 and f32. When you create platform link yourself, then you can upgrade without turning off signature verification.
I got mad it always breaks and prepared automated test [1]. Hope next time rolling rawhide would be possible. I report issue with that every release and got tired of it. It is a bit better now, but not great.
1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/pull-request/76 2. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/pull-request/77
On 8/25/20 12:16 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25. 08. 20 v 11:40 Petr Menšík napsal(a):
Hi Vít,
Unfortunately your workaround does not on my rawhide container. I think the problem is in missing gpg keys from fedora-gpg-keys, which do not contain also architecture specific keys.
# rpm -q fedora-repos fedora-repos-rawhide fedora-gpg-keys fedora-repos-33-0.9.noarch fedora-repos-rawhide-33-0.9.noarch fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.9.noarch
# sudo dnf -y --enablerepo=updates --enablerepo=rawhide update fedora-gpg-keys
The `--enablerepo=rawhide` is the issue IMO.
You should understand, that Rawhide up to the branching point was F33 and signed by F33 key. So first you need to update to at least fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.9.noarch.rpm (and note the '33' there), which is signed by known F33 key but already contains the F34 key. Since that point you can use F34 packages signed by F34 key.
No, it should have worked this way, but it did not. Made pull request for f32 update [2]. It should be done also for f31, if there is still time for that.
Vít
Last metadata expiration check: 0:54:22 ago on Tue Aug 25 10:24:53 2020. Dependencies resolved. ===================================================================================================================================== Package Architecture Version Repository Size ===================================================================================================================================== Upgrading: fedora-gpg-keys noarch 34-0.2 rawhide 105 k
Transaction Summary
Upgrade 1 Package
Total size: 105 k Downloading Packages: [SKIPPED] fedora-gpg-keys-34-0.2.noarch.rpm: Already downloaded
warning: /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/fedora-gpg-keys-34-0.2.noarch.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 45719a39: NOKEY Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64 (0x9570FF31) is already installed The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: fedora-gpg-keys-34-0.2.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64 The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED
I have complained two release before and this is still the same. It always break on new release. The only option now is to install it by hand from koji, where it is not yet signed (yuck!)
# dnf install https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/fedora-repos/34/0.2/noarch/fedo...
Then your commands would work, followed by normal upgrade.
Filled bug #1872248 for it. It should finally work without user even fiddling with gpg keys manually. Is there some pressure to keep users from using rawhide?
On 8/17/20 1:42 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just as a reminder to all Rawhide users, this is the easiest way to keep using Rawhide after branching:
$ sudo dnf update fedora-gpg-keys $ sudo dnf update fedora-repos --release 34Unfortunately, there has been no progress on [1] during past months.
Vít