On 30/01/17 12:34 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am 27.01.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>> On 27/01/17 13:02 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>> Am 27.01.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>>>> As part of the
https://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F26Boost163
>>>> change to update Boost in F26 I've started rebuilding the packages
>>>> that depend on Boost, using the f26-boost side tag. That means I've
>>>> pushed a bumpspec change to their spec files, but the rebuilt package
>>>> won't land in rawhide until they're all done and everything in
the
>>>> side tag is merged back to the main f26 target.
>>>>
>>>> If you maintain a package that depends on Boost and this will
>>>> interfere with any package maintenance you're doing please let me
>>>> know
>>>> and I'll coordinate the rebuilds with you.
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to get all these rebuilds done before the mass rebuild
>>>> next
>>>> week, but as usual there will be lots of FTBFS cases.
>>>
>>> There will be a new release for SWIG during today. Please don't
>>> rebuild SWIG for now. I'll take care to have it built in the
>>> side-tag properly.
>>
>> OK, thanks.
> Swig is properly build in f26-boost now.
Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is
rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed due to a known bug for ppc64le:
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR79197
I'll resubmit the failed hdf5-build as soon as gcc-7.0.1-0.4.fc26 with
the fix for PPC64LE has finished building.