Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr writes:
However, I'm not stuck on that one and it's probably not useful to stay stuck on it if there's not enough support to do it. So, let's find a different solution.
What exactly do you want to do with this list of lightly-maintained packages?
I have been wondering this myself: what advantage will this bring, besides a bit more peace of mind for the maintainer?
I'd also like to point out that we actually have a concept for lightly maintained packages that cannot reach end users: modularity. I know its not popular, but it would be an option for this. However, I wouldn't be a fan if it being used like this.
Cheers,
Dan