On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:26:06PM +0100, Tomas Janousek wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:16:26AM +0100, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
Can anyone see a problem with the plan, or an important feature that the above fails to address?
If I understood it correctly, every locate search would read the files on the remote volumes, right? The performance will suffer a bit I think. For example, NFS over 11mbit wifi is fine, but waiting tens of seconds for the database to download isn't good. Probably a global locate cache db that merges all the fs-local ones would be nice.
Perhaps the remote .mlocatedbs could be cached based on size and timestamp?