On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:24:57AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
And if those distributions were LSB compliant, then one is to assume that distros that do not switch to using /srv must be LSB compliant also. ;o)
To be fair, SuSE started doing that as a result of discussion on the LSB list long ago.
In any case, I think it's a mistake to make /srv not-optional -- not all systems have data that should go there.