On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> Its kinda funny how the GNOME side is ending up on the 'conservative'
> side here. We are pretty agressive in pushing new stuff into each
> release. But we believe it is better to do that _before_ the release,
> not after.
Right, aggressive between Fedora releases, conservative within a Fedora
release. I kind of wish everybody did that, and actually treated our
stable releases as, you know, stable releases, otherwise what's the
point of even making releases, and going through freezes and feature
processes and...
I believe that is the way it should be. The releases must be there
every once in a while when the installer is updated, e.g.. when the
default file system is changed, or when gnome is finally obsoleted
etc. Otherwise F10=F11 until the last day of F-10's lifetime, in my
perspective. It's just my opinion, as I don't maintain any core
components and there might be things that I'm not considering.
Orcan