"Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com>
writes:
We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
it will go nowhere.
I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would
like to be able to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't
really see a lot of negative effects of this.
I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable, since if an
update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just look into bodhi first and
see if the issue affected others as well. If by chance the first reporter of a bug is too
late in bodhi this connection is simply lost.
I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional entry point,
when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug.
Johannes
>
> From the other side, as a maintainer, it is important to have as few
> channels for reporting issues as possible. Keeping everything in one
> place is important so nothing gets lost, and it all can be queried and
> triaged appropriately.
>
> Please do not use bodhi as a bug reporting tool.
>
> Thanks,
> --Robbie