On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:08 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius
<rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:53 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de>
wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 12:38 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> >> Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>> >> > Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >> The fact that they switched to CentOS is *good* for Fedora.
>> > I can not disagree more - To me, it's yet another evidence of Fedora
>> > being on the loose.
>>
>> You're going to have to expound on that. I do not see Centos in any
>> way as in competition with Fedora.
> EPEL drains away resources from Fedora.
>
> If people were investing the time they (as I feel waste) on supporting
> EPEL into Fedora, Fedora would be better.
>
Ok. Ralf.. if you hate Fedora
Absolutely not.
and all its projects so much, why do you
fricking stay around. Every fricking thread its "Fedora has too much
bueracracy. Fedora has a broken build system. EPEL steals resources..
" What are you doing?
I am complaining about a _few_ people having run down a
once fascinating
project, with the very same people closing their eyes in front this, of
what I consider to be an inconvenient truth.
Wrt. EPEL, I have always had the same opinion on it, since the very
beginning.
>> Sure. With more devs, servers, time, etc.
> ... less bureaucracy, less committees/less chiefs/more Indians,
> different people, different strategies.
Then DO SOMETHING.
Sigh, I repeatedly have been trying to do
something, but always the same
"Fedora chiefs" had machine-gunned almost each and every proposal.
You know, you have been one of these - Do I really have to be more
direct?
Ralf