On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Why would we want to? Just let things going as long as there is at
least one
maintainer committing something. Even if not all security issues get fixed,
it's better than if none gets fixed.
Ha! Keeping a branch open because one maintainer interested in
something. That's not a distribution. That's a personal respository.
-jef