On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:53:33 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Tom Lane <tgl <at> redhat.com> writes:
> So, sure enough, I got blindsided by the fact that rawhide's RPM now
> applies patches with --fuzz=0. I don't object to tightening the
> policy like that, but it's pretty unhappy-making that having tested
> an SRPM on my Fedora 9 system offers no protection against the koji
> build failing.
For the KDE packages, we're simply adding %define _default_patch_fuzz
2 to our specfiles whenever a patch doesn't apply due to fuzz.
eww... why not rebase the patch instead?
(while making sure it's still a valid result)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan(a)linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit
http://www.lesswatts.org