Re: with or without fedora-usermgmt

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > > Don't you think somebody should make some decision here:
> > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html
> > > flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there
> > >
> > > My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt.
> >
> > My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well,
>
> And what do you plan to do during upgrade if there are some slots
> already occupied?

The suggestion of falling back to a dynamic UID is probably best -- then
those systems are no worse than before.