On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik mrsam@courier-mta.com wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks?
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
I would produce a report before sending any mails. A report suming up the occurrence of each missing dependency. Eyeballing the top slots of this list should highlight some obvious things to fix first like the /bin/sh one. You want to avoid reporting global or near global items on a per package basis.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list