On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:42 AM Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 1:53 PM kevin <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:18:49PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hrm. It looks like at least some of those issues were transient, yes.
> > However, two issues are still left:
> >
> > - libdkimpp-2.0.0-6.fc33 is tagged with f33 and f34 but 2.0.0-3.fc32
> > is in the f33 repos
>
> f34 should have been fine... f33 the newer one was only tagged in this
> morning:
>
> Wed Aug 26 03:25:54 2020 libdkimpp-2.0.0-6.fc33 tagged into f33 by humaton [still
active]
>
> So it should be in today's f33 compose, but indeed I don't see it there.
> Odd.
>
> oh. Man. I sure hate timezones. ;)
>
> It was tagged after the f33 compose started.
>
> > - swift-lang-5.2.5-1.fc33 is tagged with f33 and f34 but 5.2.4-3.fc33
> > is in the f33 repos
>
> Same here. Tagged in this morning, should be fixed tomorrow.
I untagged them since they are directly tagged to f33 tag without
getting right with fedora-33 key. I am tagging them to
f33-updates-candidate to let bodhi take care of the process flow since
we are in freeze now.
And its not possible, since there is a update with the same build that
got pushed to f34, sigh.
I will work with adamw in creating a FBR to push these updates
directly to the f33 tag.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Both these packages were built ~two weeks ago, so maybe they were
> > > screwed up by the mass branching somehow?
> >
> > Yeah, possibly so.
> >
> > kevin
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org