On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 20:13 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:28:11AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
I am sorry, but I do not see a real need for special guideline for the fipscheck checksums. The policy where these checksums should/will be placed should be decided by the fipscheck package itself. Of course I
As soon as multiple packages are affected, there should be a guideline to document how something needs to be done to work, e.g. if someone wants to package a new software that contains fips checksums.
Huh, shouldn't reading documentation in fipscheck package be sufficient?
Of course the documentation in the fipscheck package has to be changed to reflect the change.