On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Patrice Dumas [12/10/2008 16:29] :
>
> It doesn't go beyond the requirements for a fedora LTS. If fedora LTS
> isn't on par with fedora from the infrastrructure point of view, it is
> not worth pursuing.
At which point we're back to making excuses for not actually doing
anything and demanding that people who aren't interested in Fedora LTS
do the needed work.
Which work? Not shutting down builders and other infras for the EOL
branches? In my proposal I propose to find somebody to do the signing,
which is the only part that requires work -- unless I am missing
something.
I am not competent in infrastructure building nor have I the time to
lead a project which includes building an infrastructure. But I can lead
a project targeted at packaging the core of fedora for LTS -- but only
the packaging part.
This is insane and if everybody had that atitude, half the Fedora
SIGs
would never have seen the light of day.
Most of the SIGs don't need specific infrastructure. The analogy is
EPEL, but EPEL got support.
--
Pat