On 08/05/2009 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
And maintainers can choose whether or not they
want to take on the work of shipping updates in the adventurous
repository.
How does this work? It would seem that the adventurous repository would
be mandatory as something that changes ABI would require other packages
to be rebuilt.
Also, having the expectation that the other repository is for security
updates doesn't address the problem of a security release breaking ABI.
-Toshio