On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:25:38AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler
<kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
> Why would we want to? Just let things going as long as there is at least one
> maintainer committing something. Even if not all security issues get fixed,
> it's better than if none gets fixed.
Ha! Keeping a branch open because one maintainer interested in
something. That's not a distribution. That's a personal respository.
If it turns out that no community agregates around that idea and it is
indeed a personnal repository it should be stopped, but you cannot know
if you don't try.
--
Pat