RE: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!

[مصعب الزعبي]

Thank You for Care .. from everybody for this case .. 

I know that talking about Fedora as a backdoor container makes us angry .. But we must be
careful about these sensitive issues.

As a reply :

My friend didn't have enabled auto-update.
He completely Surprised of un-human-authorized connection by fedora.
He disabled these actions by :

sudo echo  127.0.0.1 vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org proxy3.fedoraproject.org
apps.fedoraproject.org 6-55-236-85.rev.customer-net.de >> /etc/hosts

As a Fedora Developers .. We must be Transparents

Kind Regards
Mosaab

>  From: fw(a)deneb.enyo.de
>  To: moceap(a)hotmail.com
>  CC: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
>  Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:11:23 +0100
>  
>  * مصعب الزعبي:
>  
>  > Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.
>  >
>  > And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!
>  >
>  > He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates enabled and
> controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
>  >
>  > vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
>  >
>  > proxy3.fedoraproject.org
>  >
>  > And both directed to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps
>  
>  Hi Mosaab,
>  
>  Fedora uses a mirror list service.  This service tells the Fedora
>  updater where it can download updates.  Please tell your friend that
>  this is completely normal.  In fact, it is required to keep his Fedora
>  installation up to date and secure.
>  
>  Florian
>  
>  PS: Please do not start a new discussion by replying to an existing
>  message.  Please write your question as an email message from scratch.
>