Am 02.10.2014 um 17:34 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you misunderstood me
I don't think anyone misunderstood that you have trouble disagreeing without also being insulting
my god i brought an cynical example what upstream may write in the changelog and i doubt that you people are that hypersensitive about every single word in real life too
You are pushing off people who might otherwise be sympathetic to your perspective by constantly engaging in a discussion the way you do it. Please stop.
*that* would be the exact message i would write in the log a upstream maintainer if someone tells me my application which works just fine needs a update because it otherwise is not displayed
Good thing that noone has asked for that. Please read the link
if nobody asked for that then Richard better had just only posted that link and not written it word by word so people don't care at all for a grpical installer would have ignored it
"or apps that haven't had an upstream release in 5 years" is part of the mail i responded to *word by word* - no idea where that leaves space for interpretation independent how often quotes are stripped to lose context
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px Datum: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:32:02 +0100 Von: Richard Hughes hughsient@gmail.com Antwort an: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org An: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2 October 2014 15:17, Tim Lauridsen tim.lauridsen@gmail.com wrote:
I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from a Software manager, because they don't live up to some visual quality guidelines.
There's actually a whole load of reasons why we'd blacklist applications: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib#guidelines-for-applications for instance programs that identify themselves as "settings" or apps that haven't had an upstream release in 5 years