Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes:
It's APSL 2.0, not Apache. Unless they've changed it. And that therein is the problem (well, one of them.)
They changed the license from APSL 2.0 to Apache 2.0 a few hours ago: http://lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-dev/2006/Aug/msg00067.html http://launchd.macosforge.org/
Now of course, if what's required is GPL compatibility (which is what the wiki says), this won't change much.
Kevin Kofler