Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Not sure which one you are referring to. I understand X wants Y to
> specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here.
> Yum is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance.
Ok, shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt. Yum update
transactions /will/ in fact bring xulrunner into the transaction set.
You could verify this yourself if you tried. Apologies to Michael.
You were correct. I was referring to direct/indirect dependencies to yum
itself and not update transactions.
Rahul